• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • Final Year Project Papers & Reports
    • School of Electrical Systems Engineering (FYP)
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • Final Year Project Papers & Reports
    • School of Electrical Systems Engineering (FYP)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Simulation flux distribution and loss calculation of three phase transformer core 100kVA using FEM

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    References and appendix.pdf (108.8Kb)
    Conclusion.pdf (98.26Kb)
    Results and discussion.pdf (264.7Kb)
    Methodology.pdf (707.5Kb)
    Literature review.pdf (256.5Kb)
    Introduction.pdf (147.7Kb)
    Abstract, Acknowledgement.pdf (186.4Kb)
    Date
    2008-04
    Author
    Izzat, Rosli
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This theses describes result of simulation flux distribution and loss calculation on three phase transformer core 100kVA using FEM. From these theses, best material and best T-Joint configuration can be found. It’s important to make sure transformers work at 100% efficiency. Transformer is a device that transfers electrical energy from one circuit to another circuit with a shared magnetic field. Transformer can converts voltage by step-up and step-down. The transformer core is used to provide a controlled path for the magnetic flux which generated in the transformer. The core is built up from thin sheet – steel with many layers of lamination. The lamination that is used to reduce heating on transformer core will cause power losses. Three types of transformer core were used in this simulation such as M5, MOH and ZDKH. T-Joint configuration is importance in avoidance the losses. Transformer core configurations in this simulation were 23˚ T-Joint, 45˚ T-Joint, 60˚ TJoint and 90˚ T-Joint. Simulation on power loss and flux distribution will be done by using FEM software called Quickfield 5.5. QuickField is an interactive environment for electromagnetic, thermal and stress analysis. QuickField can perform linear and nonlinear magnetostatic analysis for 2-D and axisymmetric models. Flux density for M5 was 1.79T better than the MOH and ZDKH material which only 0.207T and 0.214T. Best T-Joint configuration for each material was 60˚ T-Joint. Flux line, flux density and T-Joint configuration were an important factor in causing the differences in performance.
    URI
    http://dspace.unimap.edu.my/123456789/4482
    Collections
    • School of Electrical Systems Engineering (FYP) [218]

    Atmire NV

    Perpustakaan Tuanku Syed Faizuddin Putra (PTSFP) | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    All of UniMAP Library Digital RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Atmire NV

    Perpustakaan Tuanku Syed Faizuddin Putra (PTSFP) | Send Feedback