dc.description.abstract | Electroencephalogram (EEG) signal is non-stationary signal that have low frequency component and amplitude compared to stationary signal. Therefore, present of unwanted substance (nicotine) in Tobacco smoking will alter the brain electrical activity. This paper is proposed to investigate the changes of EEG signal with the present of nicotine and identify the difference brain signal between smoker and non-smoker. There are 20 males (10 smokers, 10 non-smokers) are selected. The subjects are
chosen based on inclusion criteria (abstained from smoking within 6 hours before experiment, and do not
take any medication and caffeine). The recorded EEG signal contain a lot of noise such as head moving,
muscle movement, power line, eyes blinks and interference with other device. Butterworth filter are
implemented to remove the unwanted noise present in the original signal. Bandpass filter is used to
decompose the EEG signal into alpha, theta, delta and beta frequency. Then, eight features (mean,
median, maximum, minimum, variance, standard deviation, energy and power) have been extracted by
using Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) and Power Spectral Density (PSD) method. Then, four different type
of kernel function (‘Linear’, 'BoxConstraint', ‘Polynomial’ and ‘RBF’) of SVM classifier are used to
identify the best accuracy. As a result, PSD (97.50%) have higher performance accuracy than FFT
(97.33%) by using Radial Basis Function (RBF) of Support Vector Machine (SVM). Smoking activity
caused slightly increase theta and delta frequency. Smoking is activated of five electrode channels (Fp1,
Fp2, F8, F3 and C3) and caused additional emotion such as deep rest, stress releasing and losing
attention. The attention of smokers can be measure by using stroop test. After smoking activity, smokers
become more energetic and increase the time response (1.77 s) of stroop test compared to non-smokers
(2.96 s). The result is calculated by using statistical analysis (t-test). The p-value is 0.037 which is less
than 0.05. Thus, the null hypothesis is rejected and conclude there is significant different between
smokers and non-smoker performance before and after smoking task. | en_US |