Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorC., L. Gan
dc.contributor.authorE., K. Ng
dc.contributor.authorB., L. Chan
dc.contributor.authorUda, Hashim, Prof. Dr.
dc.contributor.authorF., C. Classe
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-25T06:55:50Z
dc.date.available2013-06-25T06:55:50Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2012, 2012, pages 1-7en_US
dc.identifier.issn1687-4110
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.hindawi.com/journals/jnm/2012/173025/
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.unimap.edu.my/123456789/26072
dc.descriptionLink to publisher's homepage at http://www.hindawi.comen_US
dc.description.abstractBondpad cratering, Cu ball bond interface corrosion, IMD (intermetal dielectric) cracking, and uncontrolled post-wirebond staging are the key technical barriers in Cu wire development. This paper discusses the UHAST (unbiased HAST) reliability performance of Cu wire used in fine-pitch BGA package. In-depth failure analysis has been carried out to identify the failure mechanism under various assembly conditions. Obviously green mold compound, low-halogen substrate, optimized Cu bonding parameters, assembly staging time after wirebonding, and anneal baking after wirebonding are key success factors for Cu wire development in nanoelectronic packaging. Failure mechanisms of Cu ball bonds after UHAST test and CuAl IMC failure characteristics have been proposed and discussed in this paper.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherHindawi Publishing Corporationen_US
dc.subjectNanoelectronicsen_US
dc.subjectWirebondingen_US
dc.subjectCu wireen_US
dc.titleTechnical barriers and development of Cu wirebonding in nanoelectronics device packagingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.urlclgan pgg@yahoo.comen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record